"'You're' is a contraction of 'you are', whereas 'your' indicates ownership! Furthermore, I find the conservative position on corporate deregulation to be dangerously simplistic, you blood-sucking freak!"
NOTE: This post was begun on the day of the official start of the Scott Walker recall petition period, which, as you know, is just closing today. I just finally went back and finished it today. Apologies about the quasi-outdatedness of it. I hope you enjoy it, regardless of its Total Lack of Timeliness. xoxo-Laur
I'll tell you what.
I was
all psyched to come out to le local coffee shop and blog the shit out of this evening, because it has been simply forevs, and I've been a-hakerin' to write. But now that I'm here, on this fine November 14th, the day before my birthday, the anniversary of my nativity, I find I am almost TOO EXCITED to type a even a single obscure-yet-witty-pop-cultural-reference. Almost.
It's not because it is almost my birthday, although that's cool too.
Nope, I'm SUPER FUCKING EXCITED because tomorrow is the
FIRST DAY OF THE SCOTT WALKER RECALL PROCESS! YESSSSSSSS!!!!! (Fist pump! Snoopy dance!)
I know, I know. You're all like, "Chill, Laur! We have 60 days of signature gathering ahead of us, and there is no guarantee that this shit'll actually work."
True enough, friends, especially with whack ass stunts like
cyber-attacks on United Wisconsin's website and people claiming that they're going to "infiltrate" recall offices so that they can
illegally destroy signatures. But I still can't help feeling that special holiday feeling. It's not unlike the way I get super jazzed for Halloween in about mid-July. I know it's a big job, but I think we can do this. I really do.
Unfortunately, this means that what EZ lovingly refers to as my "internet autism" could get even worse, at least for a while.
He is not wrong, btw.
I have come to realize that I'm am Internet Knowledge Addict.
I realize how incredibly pretentious that sounds, but I
really don't mean it that way. I'm not, like, sitting around all day absorbing chess strategies, working up formulas for measuring black holes and studying the complete works of Dostoyevsky. Well, mostly not. Although, I did read a really great short story online last night;
The Ones Who Walk Away From Omelas, by Ursula K. LeGuin. I'm going to link it, so you can
read it. It's really short, so you should go read it as soon as you're done here, and then go argue about the meaning of it with some Ayn Rand fans on
Goodreads or something. Go ahead, have a ball! Oh, but finish reading my blog, first, m'kay? (And then friend me on Goodreads, because I am a dork.)
Hello, my name is Lauryl, and I'm an internet compulsive.
If there's a song I like, I can't just like it. I have to look up the video on YouTube, google the lyrics, check WhoSampled to find out what all the samples are and then look up the album that the original, sampled song came from on Amazon to see how much it is selling for. If I'm in the mood for cake, I must google pictures of cake. If I'm feeling crafty, I'll go poke around on the Martha Stewart website and try to figure out how to punk up all of the projects. If I'm depressed, I go to Regretsy and laugh at all the shitty art. Then I eventually end up on regular Etsy, mooning over things I can't afford and don't have time to make myself...and then I start looking at my own poorly maintained and barely seen Etsy page and feeling inferior, and then I get thinking about pottery, and then I get distracted by the Wikipedia article on
haniwa horses...
Knowledge, in general, is mostly a good thing, but I'm the first to admit that amongst all of the valuable and worthy things I've learned on The Internet, there are quite a few coprolites mixed in among the gems.*
For instance, who really needs to know that one of the girls from MTV's Sixteen and Pregnant recently lost custody of her kid? Nobody but her mom, who is probably caring for said kid right now, poor woman. Or, did you know that Justin Bieber is being accused of fathering a child with one of his fans? Of course you didn't! Because who the fuck cares! And yet: I POSSESS THAT KNOWLEDGE. I am now a Level 5 Useless Celebrity Gossip Mage.
*A coprolite is a fossilized piece of dinosaur shit, by the way. That particular...uh, nugget of knowledge comes courtesy of my dinosaur obsessed 4-year-old. I am practically an amateur paleontologist now. Por exemplo: Tyrannosaurus Rex ("Tyrant King" in Latin. What a magnificent, beastly moniker!) is a member of the suborder theropoda, which is characterized by all of its members having three-toed feet. Other theropods include Allosaurus, Spinosaurus and the mighty Giganotosaurus, which was like a T. Rex except EVEN FUCKING HUGE-ERER! "Theropoda" is greek for "beast feet." BAM! I didn't even have to google that shit.Some Useless Knowledge is, in reality, Useful Knowledge, because it helps me Totally Rock at crossword puzzles, or it helps me and my beau to Wipe The Floor with The Competition at Trivial Pursuit, or it helps me to, like, be a well-rounded person who has historical context for current world events and discuss them thoughtfully and thoroughly or some shit like that. And some useless knowledge is just plain delightful to have tingling around in your noodle like some kind of delicious chocolate brain phosphate. Like
THIS.
Or
THIS.
Or
THIS!
Dammit, now I really want a chocolate phosphate.
But I will tell you, some knowledge I really just need to stop putting in there. Sometimes I cannot stop myself from reading articles about horrible, depressing, unspeakable tragedies, like Michele Bachmann.
And sometimes...okay,
oftentimes...I cannot stop myself from clicking on the link to the
comments section of these unspeakably tragic articles. With the notable exception of floods, famines, fires and genocides, is there anything more truly tragic and devoid of humanity than an internet comments section? Every time I read one, it takes a little piece of my soul and buries it in a landfill somewhere,where it will remain forever without properly biodegrading and becoming part of the cycle of life again. And every time I can't stop myself from replying to some jackass xenophobic paranoiac (who has apparently turned off the spellcheck on his keyboard AND forgotten that he can google things like, say, rape statistics
pretty easily, instead of just making them up on the spot), it's like someone went out and murdered a sea turtle with a plastic six-pack ring, only that turtle is my heart.
Intellectually, I understand that a person who believes that all liberals eat children and piss on Bibles is not a person who is going to care about my [relatively] well-researched statistics. In my brain, I know that homophobic chach-meister dudes who think that Eli Roth is an unsung genius are simply not mentally prepared to understand any aspect of the term "rape culture". And I know that all the reason in the world will never dissuade the armchair corporatists and temporarily embarrassed millionaires and fundamentalist creationists and dubious, doubting climate skeptics from their mission to insult a random stranger online. BUTDAMMITSOMETIMESIJUSTCAN'THELPMYSELF!!!!!
Argh!
Today, I was listening to Wisconsin Public Radio, because National Public Radio is
way too cool for this cat.
Talk of the Nation was on, and this particular episode featured an interview with David Bellos, the director of the Translation and Intercultural Communication program at Princeton. Bellos was saying that what he finds most frustrating about working as a translator is that people mistakenly believe that language can be translated with perfect accuracy. He says that in fact, perfect accuracy is not possible, as languages cannot be translated on a 1:1 ratio.
For instance, in Russia, there are different words to describe every shade of the color blue. Sky blues and midnight blues and cadet blues, teals and ceruleans and indigos all get their own unique word, which is not unlike English. But in Russian, there is no blanket term, "blue". So, when a translator needs to translate "blue" from English into Russian, they must choose the best word to use for themselves. Which blue to use? It's up to the translator to figure out how best to preserve the original meaning, as they have interpreted it.* Bellos goes on to say that every use of language, even when we are speaking our own language to another native speaker, is an exercise in translation. You are translating your thoughts, choosing your words, and someone else is reading or listening to them, and interpreting what you say.
*Another good example of how the 1:1 ratio does not work is the Yahoo Babelfish translator. I find it delightful in its interpretive inaccuracy. Sometimes, I like to take a block of lyrics from a famous song, translate them into another language, and then translate them back into English again. Then I post them on friend's Facebook walls. Because I'm online way, way too much.**
**For instance, here are the lyrics to Closer, by Nine Inch Nails, translated from English to Dutch and back again: "I want to fuck you of an animal keep. My whole is existed has been marred. YOU become me dense to god!" I admit to being a Word Nerd, living in the warm bosom of a family of Word Nerds. We're a Word Nerd Herd. I love learning new words, and coining new words, and stealing beautiful words from other languages, and playing with words I already know until they're just perfect, or just perfectly something else. But it makes it difficult, sometimes, having all this language floating around in one's head, because to a lot of people, I am uninterpretable. And a lot of people on the internet, with their weird, garbled half-constructed commentary, are uninterpretable by me.
Language can be such a terribly imperfect tool. How can we ever hope to use it to change someone else's mind about anything, let alone something important, like love, sex, ecological awareness, human rights, compassion, when a lot of us who speak English are not even speaking the same language? Especially when there are so many people that are not even fluent in their own native tongue.
Online, one lacks the benefit of looking for nonverbal cues from other people. No sarcastic grins or silly eye rolls to indicate joking sarcasm. No softening of edges. Plus, when you're not face to face with another person, it is so easy to just unleash the full force of one's anger about a given issue, isn't it? There's little to no mitigating knowledge about the other aspects of a person's life. That's how it can happen that another mom and I can end up in the internet equivalent of a knock-down, drag-out because she can seriously get up the huevos to say to me (a friend of a friend, mind you, so that we might very well
get along in real life, but we only know each other through Facebook posts) that my nursing in public is the equivalent of showing people my tits to get Mardi Gras beads. (Yes, that convo actually happened. And I will shamefacedly admit that, though I usually don't rise to such silliness, I kind of snapped; I packed that snowball right back up and verbally facewashed her with it. I do not say this with pride. I'm a little embarrassed that I let her get to me.)
The question is, would she have said that to me, in just that same way, if we'd been debating public nursing at a party? I doubt it. And would I have felt a need to respond in kind? Probably not. Normally, when we meet people in real life who are overly forceful about their opinions, we find it kind of off-putting. Online, though, everyone's an expert, and nobody has to empathize, because the other person is just a construct of letters and punctuation. It makes it a lot easier for us to march blindly forward without other people inconveniently interrupting our personal, internal bildungsroman.*
*Is this an ironic statement to make in a blog, which is typically all about "me, me, me"? I dunno. Maybe. For what it's worth, I make it a point in my life not to take my point of view for granted, though I am not always as successful at it as I hope to be.In this light, the invention of emoticons and acronymics like "LOL" not only make perfect sense, they are an inevitable result of a life lived increasingly in text. They're an attempt to reach across the ether, the no-contact version of a human touch. :)
I really wish that I could have rewound that breastfeeding argument and found a way for me and the other woman in question to discuss things without all that heat. Ideally, I would have liked for us to be a little empathetic.
I've always been comfortable living in text. Prose is one of my preferred mediums of expression and it is often the filter through which I most comfortably and naturally enter the world. When I write, I feel clear-headed, sure of myself, safe, smart, and saved from the awkward pauses and verbal sprinting and cautious ums, dudes, and like, y'knows that pepper my verbal communications. Sometimes, when I am excited about something, I talk so fast, I actually run out of breath. Communicating via text is sometimes a great relief for me.
But I don't know if I am quite ready for the rest of the world and all of their maddening improperly placed apostrophes to join me here in Textville. (She said, revealing her snobbery.
Mea culpa.) I don't know if everyone is quite ready to join. I'd like to daydream that all of this new text-based communication will eventually create a whole new society of better writers, and maybe it will, but maybe being brilliant with a
bon mot isn't all that important of an achievement. Maybe the thing I'm really not ready for has less to do with my snooty attitude towards grammatical imperfections and impenetrable, poorly constructed sentences (although I do hate that,
urgh! ), and more to do with the loss of empathy that comes with the lack of contact.
I mean, there are people out there,
right now, just sitting around their computers, looking at YouTube videos and calling the thirteen year old girls in them "whores" for lip-synching to Beyonce. You know I'm right.
And I'm sure that a good deal of them are the
exactly the mentally unbalanced trolls we imagine them to be, sitting in the dark in a pool of sweat, masturbating to a picture of JarJar Binks , their hands covered in Chee-to powder from the empty chip bags that litter their sad, cat-pee smelling apartments. But I'll bet a
lot of them are fairly normal, somewhat clueless people who just think they're having a larf or two. ("Dude, it was a JOKE! Gah, you feminazis have no sensa
humor!") Sometimes, I'll even see a friend who I know is a nice, good person post something online that makes me go, "Ummmm..."
I know none of this comes as a revelation to anyone, but for some reason, I have such a hard time ignoring it. I think I'm hard-wired to defend underdogs wherever I may find them. Blame my entire middle school experience, I seem to be constitutionally unable to let a person think they got away with bullying someone else. I'm like a really crappy, nerdy superhero that never physically rescues anyone. Buffy the Troll Slayer. It's bad.
So, what to do about it? I've decided that for now, the only thing to do is to go on a diet from internet comment sections. I'm adding it to my New Year's resolutions list, along with my vow to eat one raw vegetable every day (because I don't) and to say "Happy Birthday" to people on Facebook when I see that it's their birthday (because it is nice to wish people a happy birthday).
So far, I've been doing waaaaay better on the vegetables and the birthday wishes than I have on not-reading comments sections, but I'd like to believe that there is hope for me yet.
If not, I'll just have to drive a stake through my computer.
Or, as they say in the Netherlands:
I will float a prop by my computer and killing only such as Buffy, the assassin of the vampire.